This horror story is probably the reason that we aren’t legally allowed to pack heat in hospitals here in the Lone Star.
A Kentucky man who claims his penis was removed without his consent during what was supposed to be a circumcision has sued the doctor who performed the surgery.
Seaton’s attorney said the doctor’s post-surgical notes show the doctor thought he detected cancer and removed the penis.
I don’t care if you think you detect anthrax infected Al-Queda with suitcase nukes, you don’t cut off someones genitals without permission. I’m not a doctor ( I know it’s a shock), but I’m pretty sure that no matter how bad the cancer in your penis is there is time for a second opinion, or at least one last intimate moment with the person of your choosing (or any attractive nurse).
I’m not trying to advocate violence, but if I go under for a routine procedure and wake up looking like an angel from Dogma, you better go run and hide.
Attorney Kevin George said a later test did detect cancer.
It still doesn’t matter, you don’t turn someone asexual without permission. As far as I am concerned this guy is well within his rights to off the doctor. It is acceptable to remove appendixes, gall bladders, kidneys, lungs, and sometimes digits or limbs without permission. Amputating genitals without prior consent is grounds for hanging. That doctor and the government should be happy that I am not eligible to be on that jury, because the amount of money that I would award that guy would offset the $700 billion bailout.
Full article is here.